Blog Archive

Friday, February 13, 2015

Week 1

Hello everybody,
            I had a very fun and exciting week working at Synergy. Not only did I collect information from patients, but I also learned some therapy techniques and exercises. I spent most of the time following Vincent’s instruction in assessing the patients and supervising their activities. The more time I spend there, the more I learn about the detailed motions that can determine mobility and health.
            The most surprising revelation I had involved the overall concept of physical therapy. Vincent has a clear, basic theme of dealing with an injury. When an injury occurs, either by a problem in the muscles or bones, scar tissue builds around the injury and the patient loses mobility or experiences pain in that area. He believes that the effective method requires breaking down the scar tissue, re-injuring the site to promote blood flow and vascular reconstruction, and then healing the muscles the way he wants to. The surprising aspect is how uncommon his method is. Other physical therapy studios will just focus on stretching the affected area and trying to slowly build up muscle there. The patients will usually see initial improvement, just from increased strength, but cannot fully resolve the underlying issue because the damaging effects were never removed.
            I initially expected for physical therapy to orient around building back a muscle that is weakened from injury. Instead, it is all about the balance between muscles, their counterparts, and tendons. When an agonist muscle is injured, the antagonist muscles will overcompensate as the patient’s movement is altered to involve the antagonist muscles more. Therefore, the agonist muscle will stiffen from underuse as the patient has already adjusted their way of moving, and the antagonist muscle can stiffen from overuse. Also, if a muscle near a joint is injured, the tendons of that muscle will take on the workload, causing tendinitis, which results in soreness around the joint. For example, Bill, a golfer I worked with, couldn’t swing his arm due to the tendinitis he developed after undergoing a debris-cleanup surgery in the arm and an arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Vincent, through cross friction, reinjured the inflamed tendons, and although painful, promoted blood flow and regained muscle by isolated resistance exercises. Now the muscle is starting to take over once again as the main motor for movement, and Bill was able to play 9 holes just a few days ago.
            Given how interesting and creative Vincent’s methods are, I am considering reshaping my project thesis to revolve around physical therapy methods rather than what factors make physical therapy effective. This seems less intuitive and leaves plenty of more research to perform, whereas my previous question had some expected results. This week I introduced you to the basics that I learned. He has a very concrete concept of physical therapy and he summarizes it best: “Everybody has the same general design. It never changes. I just have to put the body back to its normal design.”    

12 comments:

  1. I am really fascinated by the idea of "reinjuring" the affected sites. And I would love to hear about more examples like Bill's case! You seem to be learning a lot from Vincent too. But how do you feel about the general environment? Is it typically a really busy day? Do you see patient after patient after patient?
    I like your new research direction as well! I've noticed the same thing: as soon as you get on site, you get a better idea of what's going on and what you can realistically do. Can't wait to see where this new direction takes you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for the feedback Tia. It's a really fun yet focused environment. There are always around 3-4 patients at a time, and about 5 of us watching and working on them. I have many stories lined up, so stay tuned!

      Delete
  2. Wow, the whole agonist vs antagonist muscles concept makes total sense, but I wouldn't have thought about it on my own! That's really cool. I'm sure you'll continue to learn things as you go on, and I look forward to your next post.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Zachary: It appears that you have been put into a great situation for your SRP. Not only are you learning about PT but the philosophy that Vincent uses is different but totally logical. Based on your short time at Synergy, I like that you have decided to take your SRP in a different direction. Rather than perhaps just moving forward on what you thought you wanted to do, you have assessed your circumstances and made a decision to take a different path. Good for you.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Zachary, I loved reading how your perception and the fact your direction has changed. I imaging that often times the hardest part of therapy is convincing patients that this is the right direction and I think it is great that you have so much excitement for a different approach to therapy. I look forward to reading more about these patients through your eyes.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The methods you talked about here really struck me. I was a physical therapy patient (truth be told I probably still should be), but I find this fascinating. I was unaware of the different methods of PT and am really looking forward to hearing more about them!

    ReplyDelete
  6. This sounds all amazing! You must be learning a lot about how body muscles work and operate, which is very interesting when it comes to sports. Are you going to try working with patients sometime in the future?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Alfred. I actually already am working with patients. Vincent explains what he wants to accomplish and I help by correcting their mechanics when they are exercising.

      Delete
  7. This is super interesting Zach! But I can't help cringing when you say that he re-injures the person. Isn't that extremely painful and hard to do? Also, what is the point of going through surgery and such if he is just going to remove all of that work? Basically, I am asking: to what extent does he re-injure the patient?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks. So basically the surgery is for repairing mechanical damage (putting bones back together and such). But afterwards, the patient doesn't move for a long time because of the surgery, which means the body lays down strips of scar tissue that eventually lead to limps and compensation. So even though it brings tears to the patients, we have to break that down, slightly injuring the tissue by breaking it apart, but not actually causing an injury like breaking a bone or something like that. Then we can heal it the way we want to.

      Delete
  8. Zachary,
    I love where you are going with this project! I think that the personal connection you have with your topic is crucial. I like that once you got the feel of where it was headed, you adjusted your topic a little so that it was broader.
    What Synergy does and the methods Vincent uses sound fascinating-they certainly aren't traditional. Re-injuring sounds painful but it's looks like there has been a lot success with these methods. Are there any physical therapists who disagree with these methods?
    Great work thus far.

    Hannah
    Lutheran High School, Parker CO

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you Hannah. I appreciate the interest.
      I do not believe there are therapists that disagree with the methods, but that there are those that either don't know much about it or choose not to use it for lack of efficiency.

      Delete